As an active and passionate Libertarian, the growing buzz around Dr. Ron Paul’s candidacy certainly has me unbelievably excited on one hand, but torn on another.
And less than wanting to come to any conclusions, this piece is simply about wanting to get this issue talked about by Libertarians and others sympathetic to the cause of freedom, before we lose what could be a great opportunity.
What has happened with Dr. Ron Paul since May 3rd has simply been amazing to witness. It was on that date that the message of liberty and hope, as delivered through Dr. Paul, finally re-emerged in America and directly shared the national stage with the republican voices, and indirectly the democratic voices, who have been betraying the hard working people of this country for quite some time now.
I hope that May 3, 2007 will someday be a day that is remembered for being the start of America’s Second Revolution.
It was on that day that Dr. Ron Paul’s message of liberty rang out across this wonderful place we call America like the wake up call of wake up calls. In return, people from across America shouted back that they had received the message, we’re in fact awake, and were wondering what took so long.
Are we at a magical moment in America’s history? Are the results of the polls after the debates a strong indication that Dr. Paul’s message of non-interventionism, limited government, and adherence to the constitution (get this, the same message Libertarians promote!) has come at the right time for a country desperate for a refreshing and honest political voice?
If this is true, what an amazing example it would be to America if the Libertarian Party, the party of principle, was so principled that when confronted with the opportunity for freedom that Dr. Ron Paul’s candidacy is quickly growing to be, decided that the only course of action was to endorse his candidacy and encourage other groups to join the effort as well.
Think of the possibilities.
The Libertarian Party would get major respect and publicity for being so devoted to the cause of freedom, that it would put aside party labels and be willing to endorse a candidate from another party whose commitment to liberty is as clearly obvious as it is in Dr. Ron Paul. That is putting principles and ideals ahead of labels and that is noble, best, and productive for the greater cause of freedom.
From a marketing standpoint, official or unofficial Libertarian Party support would link Dr. Paul’s growing and popular ‘brand’ of politics to our growing Libertarian ‘brand’. Once made, this connection would only help Libertarian candidates gain more attention from a public hungry for a viable political option. This could then translate to improved results for Libertarian candidates.
In light of the recent surge in interest about Dr. Ron Paul, only good things would come of the two brands being closely associated. Why do you think there always seems to be Burger King next to a McDonalds? They offer a similar product and attract the same sort of burger craving people; could the Libertarian Party become a leading provider for freedom craving people and can being associated with Dr. Ron Paul help? I think so.
And if some or all of these things did happen, the Libertarian Party could become the lightning rod for the even larger freedom movement which involves a broad cross section of Americans and groups who simply want to be left alone to live their lives as they see fit.
Could Dr. Ron Paul’s presidential candidacy be the singular event we have all been waiting for?
Is there a Libertarian out there who has not at one time or another thought of how cool it would be if Dr. Ron Paul ran for president?
What if somehow Dr. Paul did become the republican nominee, is there a Libertarian out there who would not vote for him?
Am I torn? Yes I am. I know that our bylaws do not allow us to endorse a candidate from another party. I am aware that this will have an impact on our current Libertarian presidential contenders. I am also wise enough to know that there could be other as of yet unknown consequences of such a move.
In spite of these and other not mentioned potential ramifications, I think endorsing Dr. Ron Paul is worth the risk.
Ultimately, it is my opinion that the Libertarian Party at the local, state and national levels should be far more excited about the possibilities of riding Dr. Ron Paul’s wave, than fearful about the possible negative consequences of doing so.
We have far more to gain by associating ourselves with Dr. Ron Paul than we have to lose.
Just a thought..
Mark Augustyn